Info / Official Reports

Geoengineering is defined as the deliberate large scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system for the stated goal of cooling the planet.  Geoengineers are proposing spraying 10 to 20 million tons of toxic aluminum oxide and other particles into our atmosphere.  While scientists claim that these programs are only in the planning stages, evidence is abundant that they have already been started.   Several scientific groups have addressed various geoengineering techniques.  Or area of interest and focus is on solar radiation management/stratospheric aerosol geoengineering.  These methods are commonly referred to as chemtrails.

Solar radiation management/stratospheric aerosol geoengineering:

Solar Radiation Management (SRM) techniques, which reflect a small percentage of the sun’s light and heat back into space. These methods act quickly, and so may represent the only way to lower global temperatures quickly in the event of a climate crisis. However, they only reduce some, but not all, effects of what some scientists call the problem of climate change, while possibly creating other problems . They also do not affect CO2 levels and therefore fail to address the wider effects of rising CO2, including ocean acidification.  Wether you believe in the man-made global worming theory, it is clear that geoengineers are planning on implementing these programs.

The Congressional Research Service released it new report on Geoengineering for members of the U.S. Congress on August 16, 2010. The U.S. House Science & Technology Committee released their Final Geoengineering Report on October 27, 2010. The U.S. House Science and Technology Committee on Geoengineering is working with the UK Parliament on Global Geoengineering Governance which has released its 5th Report (printed by the House of Commons), on March 10, 2010.

Click on the link below to read these reports:

http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/content/geoengineering-c...

Many private corporations, universities, government agencies, private individuals, states, counties, and cities, have deployed or will participate in deploying, a vast array of geoengineering experiments in the near future without public oversight or consent. Currently no government agency, or the U.S. Congress at this time, will have any idea what the cumulative or synergistic effects may be when these experiments are deployed. In addition, no one, not even the U.S. Congress or the public, will have any oversight of these programs, the chemicals or particles that will be used or how they will be implemented. Thus, action is needed today to prevent these questionable experiments.

The U.S. House Science & Technology Committee and the UK Parliament have engaged in an agreement to participate in geoengineering discussions and the possible implementation of global geoengineering governance proposed by the Royal Society and several climate scientists. Private and public meetings of climate scientists, with little media coverage, were initiated in February and March 2010, in California, in order to elaborate on possible geoengineering schemes and to discuss global geoengineering governance guidelines.

The purpose of one set of schemes is to initiate “Solar Radiation Management (SRM)” experiments. SRM is designed to reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth. The consequences of these SRM schemes are unknown since planetary-scale engineering involves so many different geoengineering schemes with unknown cumulative and synergistic effects.

A key AAAS February 2010, geoengineering write-up states: “…Studies show, however, that people make judgments based primarily on their values, belief systems, world views, and emotions. Facts play a much more minor role. This gap cannot be bridged by loading the public with facts, or trying to make the public more science literate…” Thus, a whole series of presentations were made to advise geoengineers and others on how to manipulate the public so that they would support these schemes.

In a Press Release Dated December of 2002 titled: “GEOENGINEERING TOO RISKY” A Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Press release warns, “…There are many reasons why geoengineering is not a preferred option for climate stabilization…” These prescriptions include risks of global “system failure” and the “unpredictable responses” of Earth’s climate system to large-scale human intervention…”

On March 22-26, 2010, the Climate Respond Fund (note the partners listing in the document section below), sponsored the Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies in Monterey, California.The conference was designed to develop (global geoengineering governance) guidelines for “…research and testing of proposed climate intervention and geoengineering technologies…”

What are the consequences of deploying Solar Radiation Management geoengineering experiments?

1) Some of these experiments are designed to reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth thus reducing the power output and the effectiveness of solar panels and solar cars.

2) Many proposed chemicals or particles used in these geoengineering schemes (i.e., U.S. Navy/NASA C.A.R.E. experiment used a rocket to create an aluminum oxide dust cloud over the Eastern portion of the U.S. on September 19, 2009), are likely to be toxic to humans, marine mammals, oceans, fish, wildlife, food pollinators, and birds. Many of these toxic chemicals, like sulfur, have the potential to contaminate drinking water, soil, cause acid rain or air pollution, and may impair human health, from lack of Vitamin D, by reducing the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth.

3) NASA research studies show that increasingly persistent jet contrails may turn into “man-made clouds” (or white haze), and are “…trapping warmth in the atmosphere and exacerbating global warming…Any change in global cloud cover may contribute to long-term changes in the Earth’s climate…” No current U.S. legislation addresses water vapor and aviation impacts on the global atmosphere. In addition, our scientists do not appear to be funding or working toward reducing or eliminating this problem. What happens when additional programs are put in place to reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth when we already have man-made clouds dimming the sun and exacerbating global warming?

4) SRM may limit Honey Bee food pollination because the bee navigates and communicates though the use of ultraviolet light. And we have no idea what the cumulative impacts of toxic chemicals, particles, and reduced sunlight will have on all of our pollinators endangering food production.

5) Photosynthesis is required for the majority of life on Earth to exist, along with healthy trees, and food crop production. When cloud cover and reduced sunlight is present crop production drops. When direct sunlight and normal rainfall is present crop production increases. What happens when geoengineers deliberate reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth? What are the consequences of multiple uncontrolled experiments?

The climate scientists and geoengineers all have one repeated mantra: “…Geoengineering is not a solution to climate change and global warming…” They are instead enlisting support to spend enormous sums to buy time to do something later. Just what research, project funding, and development are they now engaging in to fix our current pollution problems now? Nothing! They are not promoting research into benefits that will be long-lasting or make a difference now.

The “temporary fix” theory with “unknown consequences” seems to be their only contribution to the disaster they predict. Should the public be willing to accept this temporary fix with unknown consequences? This attitude is unacceptable because those conducting the geoengineering experiments will be unaccountable if their experiments go awry or create profound negative consequences.

Professor Benford (U.C. Irvine, CA), wrote the following regarding the public in a Reason.com article in 1997:“…But perhaps the greatest unknown is social: How will the politically aware public react–those who vote, anyway? If geoengineers are painted early and often as Dr. Strangeloves of the air, they will fail. Properly portrayed as allies of science–and true environmentalism–they could become heroes… A major factor here will be whether mitigation looks like yet another top-down contrivance, another set of orders from the elite. Draconian policing of fuel burning will certainly look that way, a frowning Aunt Bessie elbowing into daily details…In contrast, mitigation does not have to push a new camel’s nose into our tents… Technical solutions can play out far from people’s lives, on the sea or high in the air…Once we become caretakers, we cannot stop…(they) must be carried forward in the shadow of our stewardship…”

Instead of questionable geoengineering experiments all reductions of greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants, at their source, should be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency and all funding should go to the EPA for developing alternative energy and transportation. Scientists and researchers should be funded to invent ways to use waste energy from currently operating energy plants to produce clean, green power, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions is where funding should be directed…not to those programs and experiments that will not reduce our impact on Earth from various types of pollution sources. The energy of the geoengineers should be redirected to solve pollution problems not add to them.

On June 10, 2010, the U.S. Senate voted to uphold a 2007, U.S. Supreme Court Decision, that allows the EPA to regulated and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. There is no reason to initiate global geoengineering programs when we have the ability to reduce pollution under our laws. Reduction is the preferred alternative to pollution…not adding more toxic contaminates to our atmosphere that will impact life on Earth as we know it.

Our local, county, state and federal representatives should take immediate action to stop these geoengineering scheme deployments until scientists from every field, agriculture interests, ocean scientists, marine biologists, and the public have had time to thoroughly investigate these schemes and their effects on the Earth’s environment.

No one has the right to use the Earth, or Earth’s atmosphere, as a giant experimental physics laboratory due to the unknown consequences of such actions.

 Global Geoengineering Governance

16A 2009 Parliament.uk Website November 5, 2009 New Inquiry-Regulat...
16A 2009 UK Parliamentary Office of Science+Technology Postnote Mar...
16A 2010 GAO March 18, 2010 Preliminary Observations-Geoengineering...
16A 2010 Geoengineering Governance and Technology Policy Report by ...
16A 2010 U.S. House Science+Technology Committee Report Geoengineer...
16A 2011 Geoengineering Scientists Debate Risks of Sun-Blocking+Oth...
16A GEOENGINEERING PETITION TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH+AGRICULTURE FR...
16A Poster+Banner Geoengineering CRRES + HAARP High Altitude Aurora...
16AZ 2011 A Few Geoengineering Images Internet July 20, 2011.pdf

This section contains descriptions of all geoengineering schemes that have been discussed in the past ten years. This includes graphics and other information on these schemes.

16B 2006 Geoengineering How to Cool A Planet Maybe NYTimes Problems...
16B 2006 Geoengineering How to Cool A Planet Maybe NYTimes Problems...
16B 2006 Geoengineering How to Cool A Planet Maybe NYTimes Problems...
16B 2007 Geoengineering Methods IPCC-NASA-University of Arizona MSN...
16B 2007 Geoengineering-Top 10 Most Controversial Ways to Save the ...
16B 2007 NASA Summaries of Workshop On Managing Solar Radiation NAS...
16B 2008 Solar Radiation Management-The Radiative Forcing Potential...
16B 2008 Technofixes A Critical Guide to Climate Change Technologie...
16B 2009 Geoengineering Crazy Ideas+Experiments February 13, 2009 T...
16B 2009 Geoengineering Disastrous Projects That May or May Not Off...
16B 2009 Geoengineering Projects January 28, 2009 Climate Change.pdf
16B 2010 The Return of Dr. Strangelove June 2010 by Clive Hamilton ...
16B 2011 Arctic Geoengineering A Climate Cures Dark Side January 30...
16B 2011 Geoengineering Green Versus Greed in the Race to Cool the ...
16B 2011 What is Geoengineering February 18, 2011 Guardian.co.uk Ne...

Particles, gases, and other materials injected into the atmosphere to reduce the amount of direct sunlight reaching the Earth.

This can include, but is not limited to, sulfur and aluminum oxide.
16BS 2006 Crutzen Geoengineering C&EN August 1, 2006 Artificial...
16BS 2006 Injecting Sulfate Particles into Stratosphere Could Have ...
16BS 2006 Sulfur Geoengineering C&ENews Desperate Cooling Measu...
16BS 2006 Sulfur Upper Atmospheric Releases Geoengineering National...
16BS 2007 Geoengineering MSNBC 2007 Volcanic Dust – Jet Engines.pdf
16BS 2008 Geoengineering No Comment ScienceDaily News February 22, ...
16BS 2008 Increase the SPF of Earth Natural Sunblock With Sulfur Fe...
16BS 2008 Injecting Sulfate Particles into Stratsophere Could Have ...
16BS 2008 Sulfate Particle Atmospheric Geoengineering Would Imperil...
16BS 2008 Sulfur Geoengineering Sky May 19, 2008 Harold Sun Climate...
16BS 2008 The Sensitivity of Polar Ozone Depletion to Proposed Geoe...
16BS 2009 Geoengineering Toxic Chemicals Into Atmosphere – Problems...
16BS 2009 Nature Reports October 15, 2009 Geoengineering Risky Busi...
16BS 2009 Sulfur Intellectual Ventures Stratoshield White Paper 200...
16BS 2010 Nature Geoscience July 18, 2010 Letter Abstract Regional ...
16BS 2010 Sulfuric Acid as Gas Release Geoengineering Lift-Off The ...
16BSZ 2009 Sulfur Geoengineering Superfreaky Solution to Global War...

Artificial Clouds – Cloud Whitening Experiments – Use of Salts (Potential to contaminate soil and water when the salts rain out over land areas.)

16BW 2007 ENN News December 10, 2007 High Cloud Changes Man-Made.pdf
16BW 2008 Artificial Clouds+Other Radical Geoengineer Schemes Septe...
16BW 2008 Cloud-Seeding Ships Could Combat Climate Changes Septembe...
16BW 2008 Ocean Clouds Geoengineering-Ships SEPT 12, 2008 Researche...
16BW 2008 Saltwater Spraying into Atmosphere Image February 25, 200...
16BW 2009 Climate Crunch Great White Hope Nature April 29, 2009 Geo...
16BW 2009 Clouds Salt Flares Geoengineering Experiments Conducted C...
16BW 2009 Geoengineering Scheme Oceans 2009 1217-cloud-ships – Salt...
16BW 2009 Modification of Cirrus Clouds to Reduce Global Warming Ap...
16BW 2009 Modification of Cirrus Clouds to Reduce Global Warming Pu...
16BW 2009 Ship Cloud-Salt Geoengineering+Other Schemes Telegraph UK...
16BW 2010 Cloud Whitening Geoengineering Whiter Clouds Could Mean W...
16BW 2010 Cloud Whitening-Geoengineering Clouds-Global Warming Solu...
16BW 2010 Salt Detected in Boulder Colorado Haze March 11, 2010 Sci...
16BW 2010 Shipping Steam Releases Takes A Ride in the Shipping Lane...
16BW 2010 Ships Surprising Science Smithsonian Magazine Riled Up Ab...
16BW 2010 Skyborne Seawater Particles Change Cloud Brightness-Tempe...
16BW 2011 Cloud Whitening Geoengineering Climate Technical Fix May ...

Agriculture Issues – Photosynthesis – Ozone Depletion

16D 2007 UK Research-Rising Surface Ozone Reduces Plant Growth+Adds...
16D 2011 Swedish Scientists-Climate+Weather Changes Increases Risk ...

Bill Gates (Microsoft) has decided to become involved in Geoengineering Schemes. He is funding a few scientists who wish to engage in implementing these schemes. In addition, he has given money to various private corporations to conduct experiments.

Any individual with money and other resources, private corporations, governments, and others can use our atmoshere or oceans as an experimental physics laboratory. Universities and NASA have conducted such experiments, along with our military, for years.


It is outrageous that anyone can subject us to these experiments without our consent. And what right does Bill Gates or anyone else have to “play God” with the Earth and the Earth’s atmosphere? It is these questions which must be answered before more of these experiments and schemes are conducted. 


Note: Professor Gregory Benford of U.C. Irving stated in his article on Arctic Geoengineering on November 20, 2006: “…This idea is only the first step in making climate science…into an active science… This is not a new transition in scientific style…We will live inside the experiment …The main thrust of all this is to carefully use our ability to attack warming at its roots – incoming sunlight now, carbon dioxide later… Costs seem readily attainable – perhaps a few hundred of millions of dollars for an Arctic experiment. High altitude trials over the open ocean are little constrained by law or treaty, so show-stopper politics may be avoided…”

Funding: January 28, 2010 Wired Science: Bill Gates has sunk at least $4.5 million of his personal wealth into geoengineering research.


http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/01/bill-gates-paying-for-cli...
“…While it’s a small chunk of Gates’ vast personal fortune, it’s a sign that the founder of Microsoft thinks we should at least be looking into the controversial practice of intentionally altering the Earth’s climate on a global scale. “[Gates] views geoengineering as a way to buy time, but it’s not a solution to the problem” of climate change, Gates’ spokesperson John Pinette told Science Insider. “Bill views this as an important avenue for research — among many others, including new forms of clean energy.”


The money will be directed by two high-level scientists at the forefront of geoengineering research: climate scientist Ken Caldeira, of Stanford’s Carnegie Department of Global Ecology, and physicist David Keith of the University of Calgary. They will decide which technologies should receive the cash in order to alter the stratosphere to reflect solar energy, filter carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere and brighten ocean clouds…”
“…In a related development Keith, one of the scientists directing Gates’ money, co-authored a Nature editorial this week calling for an international fund for “solar-radiation management” in addition to traditional carbon emissions cuts. “Solar-radiation management may be the only human response that can fend off rapid and high-consequence climate change impacts,” Keith said in a press release Wednesday… He and his co-authors, Edward Parson at the University of Michigan and Granger Morgan at Carnegie Mellon University, propose a budget for solar-radiation management (aka geoengineering), beginning with $10 million a year now and growing to $1 billion annually by the end of 2020. The organization that manages the funds would also develop the governance structures to provide transparent risk analysis and manage feedback from the world’s countries…” Thus, there would be no Congressional or public oversight…complete freedom to use the oceans and the atmosphere as a private physics laboratory.

16G 2009 Bill Gates Patents A Device Aimed at Halting Hurricanes Di...
16G 2009 Bill Gates-Geoengineering TimesOnline October 18, 2009 Glo...
16G 2010 Bill Gates Backs Geoengineering Cloud Project May 13, 2010...
16G 2010 Bill Gates Funding Geoengineering Research Since 2007 Scie...
16G 2010 Bill Gates Funding Geoengineerng Projects Since 2007 Xcono...
16G 2010 Bill Gates Funding-Innovative Climate Energy Researach Web...
16G 2010 Bill Gates Funds Geoengineering Research $4.5 Million Disc...
16G 2010 Bill Gates Funds Seawater Cloud Seeding May 10, 2010 Disco...
16G 2010 Bill Gates History of Dabbling in Climate-Altering Schemes...
16G 2010 Bill Gates Pays for Artificial Clouds to Beat Greenhouse G...
16G 2010 Bill Gates Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering Schem...
16GC 2010 Bill Gates Cloud Whitening Experiments Using Salt Particl...
16GC 2010 Bill Gates Cloud-Whitening Trials A Dangerous Experiment ...
16GC 2010 Gates Promotes Use of Salt Particles to Whiten Clouds-Sal...
16GMZ 2009 Intellectual Ventures Lab-Gates Introducing StratoShield...
16GW 2009 Bill Gates Geoengineering-Sets His Sites on Controlling t...
16GW 2009 Bill Gates Hurricane Calming Technology Plan USA Today Ju...
16GW 2009 Bill Gates Hurricanes-Bid to Tame Hurricanes Times Online...
16GW 2009 Geoengineering Bill Gates Plan to Stop Hurricanes July 9,...
16GW 2009 Microsoft’s Bill Gates Plans-Ken Caldiera Patents Methods...
16GW 2010 Bill Gates Hurricane-Fighting Invention August 16, 2009 H...
16GZ 2009 Geoengineering + Patents Gates + Myhrvold Connection Goog...
16GZ 2009 Intellectual Ventures March 23, 2010 Website About Them-G...
16GZ 2009 Intellectual Ventures March 23, 2010 Website http___www.i...
16GZ 2010 Just an FYI for Research Gates Salt Particles Armand Neuk...

 

The following contain test from around the world that show contamination believed to be from chemtrail/geoengineering programs:

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/htm/tests.html

How to test:

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/html/watertesting.html

The following are patents related to geoengineering:

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/htm/patents.html

Article “What in the World are They Spraying?”

http://www.countercurrents.org/murphy030310.htm

Aluminum toxicity:

http://by155w.bay155.mail.live.com/default.aspx#!/mail/InboxLight.a...

Ocean Alliance Executive Summary of Ocean Toxic Chemicals in Whales Aluminum Levels

http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/sites/default/files/file...

 

Council on Foreign Relations Developing an International Framework for GeoengineeringK
http://www.cfr.org/climate-change/developing-international-framewor...

Geoengineer David Keith discusses geoengineering:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkEys3PeseA&feature=player_embed...!

David Keith discusses the use of aluminum in geoengineering programs at the AAAS Meeting in San Diego:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F58HbYTbKnU&feature=player_embedded

Geoengineers discuss the risks and benefits of geoengineering programs:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=598sdVtSLtA&feature=player_embedded

Source - Maui Sky Watch

Views: 519

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Related

The costs of seismic exploration

http://www.terranature.org/oceanNoise.htm

Clearly, some people think they are "gods" now, and have every right to tinker with the weather.

We should be working with the flow of nature, not fighting against it.

It's a shame Viktor Schauberger isn't still around to beat  guys like DW Keith with a big stick.

I watched a doco last night and decided the chosen ones are right - this planet is better off without humans 

Jeez, Rose, that's bit harsh! Some of us are Ok. We were put here to be Earth's caretakers, and some us are making an effort. What we're better off without is the greedy few elitists.

 

Keeping a close eye on the sudden burst of quake activity around the globe today. California, Peru, Chile......

Looks like the Pacific Plate is on the move again!

Agree about being better off without humans ... absolutely.

I can see now why God (the one I believe in ) said he'd make a new earth one day ... this one's wrecked.  When the new one's made, the ones who wrecked this one will no doubt be excluded from management positions.

If the world is better off without humans? Where is all this negativity coming from? Surely is up to us to make the world a better place. It starts with us, here, now.

It starts with my 3 beautiful children; compassionate human beings who are being taught to respect the earth and to treat it better than the last generation did.

It starts with this website, this social network, exposing truths, looking for answers and spreading the message.

To say the world is better off without us is, in my opinion, a copout, a failure to take responsibility.

What, just sit back and wait for God to sort things out?

Or wait for the loonies in power to wipe us all off the face of the earth..problem solved, no more people!

I'm sorry, but I know a lot of wonderful humans who deserve to live a wonderful life, and I dream of a better future, a future that begins with how I raise my children.

God helps those who help themselves. You want a new earth? Start doing something about it!

GRRR! ANGRY!

 

 

yeah yeah, you're right Martin ... far be it from me to just sit back & let God sort it & he doesn't expect us to either I believe ... we're supposed to stand up to injustice ... however there are days when the insanity gets to you if you get my drift? (constantly dealing with health issues doesn't help either) And a blanket statement like 'get rid of all humans' is one of those overstatements really ... not intended to be interpreted literally. I taught my kids to tell the truth, yet we are in the midst of a lying corporate world .... that angers me. Our kids need more than just the basics don't lie, steal etc. They now need a course on why the world is as it is in order to manoeuvre through it reasonably safely. And with integrity.

Yes there are days when I'm full of hope & enthusiasm to go fight battles, and others when I just want to hide inside & pretend we aren't being sprayed 24/7 from more angles than the skies.  I am

doing something about it Martin ... have a number of projects on the go in terms of raising awareness, lobbying and so forth, as are many folks on here. And it is because I care about humans really. I care that the silly sheeple are being destroyed from within their camp & they don't even know it.

Reply by Danielle on August 26, 2014 at 7:17

yeah yeah, you're right Martin ... far be it from me to just sit back & let God sort it & he doesn't expect us to either I believe ... we're supposed to stand up to injustice ... however there are days when the insanity gets to you if you get my drift? (constantly dealing with health issues doesn't help either) And a blanket statement like 'get rid of all humans' is one of those overstatements really ... not intended to be interpreted literally. I taught my kids to tell the truth, yet we are in the midst of a lying corporate world .... that angers me. Our kids need more than just the basics don't lie, steal etc. They now need a course on why the world is as it is in order to manoeuvre through it reasonably safely. And with integrity.

Yes there are days when I'm full of hope & enthusiasm to go fight battles, and others when I just want to hide inside & pretend we aren't being sprayed 24/7 from more angles than the skies.  I am

doing something about it Martin ... have a number of projects on the go in terms of raising awareness, lobbying and so forth, as are many folks on here. And it is because I care about humans really. I care that the silly sheeple are being destroyed from within their camp & they don't even know it.

Good observation of our current condition.  How do we rid ourselves of the destroyers?    I guess the old cliche from the 70s was invented for this time... Stop the World, I want to get off.  lol !  

It is clear to me the motivation to earn money plays a big part in how the world is contaminated and abused, robbed of its resources, and stripped of its protective mechanisms. 

RSS

© 2017   Created by rose.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service