Robert F Kennedy’s devastating quotes on vaccines and the CDC

 Jan 26 by Jon Rappoport   

Robert F Kennedy Jr’s devastating quotes on vaccines and the CDC

Boom—how and why the CDC can foist toxic vaccines on the American people

From Kennedy’s video presentation, “7 Minutes on the CDC,” Anne Dachel (Age of Autism) has transcribed excerpts. This is explosive material, particularly because there is a chance Kennedy will head up an investigation of vaccine safety under Trump.

Kennedy understands the inherent conflict of interest at the CDC, which operates as a vaccine sales and marketing company, while at the same time posing as a neutral scientific body that assesses vaccine safety—AND OF COURSE, THE CDC PRESENTS AN EVER-EXPANDING SCHEDULE OF “NECESSARY” VACCINES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Think of it: the CDC has the power—backed by federal and state governments, and supported by the fake-news media—to buy and sell vaccines, while deciding how many vaccines the population should submit to. What salesman wouldn’t want to work for an outfit like that?

Here are Kennedy’s remarks. Read them, study them, and learn the truth:

“The CDC is a very troubled agency, and it’s not just me saying that. There have been four separate, intensive federal investigations by the United States Congress—a three year investigation, 2001, 2002, 2003, by the United States Senate, Tom Coburn’s committee, by the Inspector General of HHS in 2008, by the Office Integrity in 2014. All of them have painted the CDC as a cesspool of corruption, of an agency that has become an absolute subsidiary of the pharmaceutical industry, and that has become a sock puppet, a spokesperson, a shill for the industry.”

“CDC is not an independent agency. It is a vaccine company. CDC owns over twenty vaccine patents. It sells about $4.6 billion of vaccines every year. And its primary metric for success in all the departments in the agency are vaccine sales. The groups, for example the Immunization Safety Office, where the scientists who are supposed to be looking at efficacy and safety in vaccines, they are no longer a public service…agency. They are subsumed in that metric: We have to sell as many of these things as possible. And so they do things to their science to make sure that nothing interferes—no information—interferes with sales.

“Now there are two divisions of the vaccine branch where we worry about the corruption. The first one is called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. That is the committee that makes the decision about what new vaccines to add to the schedule.”

“When I was a boy, I got three vaccines. My children got sixty-nine vaccines. It changed in 1989.”

“Why did it change in 1989?”

“Because in 1986, Congress, [was] drowning in pharmaceutical industry money—pharma puts more money into lobbying than any other industry—Pharmaceutical companies have more lobbyists on Capitol Hill than there are Congress people.”

“Do you think oil and gas has big influence in the Capitol? Well, that’s the next biggest. The pharmaceutical industry puts twice into lobbying, double the amount that the oil and gas, and four times what defense and aero space put in. So they control Congress.”

“In 1986, Congress passed the Vaccine Act, and there were good reasons for them to pass it. …At that time vaccine companies were being sued and were threatening to stop making vaccines. [Congress] said, okay, we’re going to insulate them from lawsuits. They made it illegal to sue a vaccine company in this country, no matter how reckless the behavior, no matter how negligent, no matter how toxic the product, no matter how grievous the injury to the child, you cannot sue.”

“You know how badly the pharmaceutical industry behaves when they are being sued, when there’s a whole bar of lawyers who spend their whole life looking for ways to sue the pharmaceutical industry and tell these stories to juries, and how many billions every year are won from that industry.”

“What do you think would happen if all of a sudden, all the lawyers disappeared, all the class action suits, all the multi district litigation, all the depositions, all the document searches, the discovery? Just gone. Nobody can sue. You can make anything you want.”

Loads more: Jon's blog

Views: 178

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Big Pharma generates $77.5 billion in revenue for every $1 million they give to corrupt politicians
"In American politics, money equals speech, so it stands to reason that a lot of money equals a lot of speech. The U.S. Supreme Court, in its 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, ruled as much – and it has led to “unprecedented amounts of outside spending” in elections since, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. And while many applauded the high court’s ruling as a victory for political “free speech” and the First Amendment, others have roundly criticized it as a ruling enshrining the notion that really, when all is said and done, American democracy is the best money can buy.”

" Big Pharma, in cahoots with regulators like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), have colluded to bury the results of many studies that show pharmaceuticals don’t work."
-- Dr. Ben Goldacre,

The Vaccine Did It: Mutated MMR Mumps Virus in the Brain of a Child Caused His Death, British Researchers Confirm

The Vaccine Did It: Mutated MMR Mumps Virus in the Brain of a Child Caused His Death, British Researchers Confirm

The Vaccine Did It

A toddler who developed severe neurological symptoms including blindness associated with chronic encephalitis and died following MMR vaccination was found to have vaccine-derived mumps virus in his brain, a new study reports.

Published in the current issue of the journal, Acta Neuropathologica, the study is the first of its kind to conclusively demonstrate chronic brain damage in the form of "panencephalitis" due to a vaccine-derived strain of the mumps virus. In light of a recent epidemic of mumps in highly vaccinated populations, the research raises questions about the dangers of live vaccine virus mutations and about public health claims that the MMR is a completely safe and effective vaccine without serious side effects.


The study describes an 18-month old infant who was diagnosed with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency Disease (SCID) -- a serious immune system defect that may follow infection -- four months after he received the triple Measles Mumps Rubella vaccine that contains live viruses.

The baby was treated for the illness but six months later became ill again with fever, rash, diarrhoea, lethargy and seizures. MRI scans of his brain showed evidence of encephalitis -- brain inflammation due to infection.

The toddler was treated with antimicrobials, antivirals and steroids and sent home on anticonvulsant drugs.  Over the next few months, behavioural problems became obvious, his hearing was impaired and his speech and language were delayed. A year later, by then four years old, he was still suffering from seizures and he became increasingly lethargic, disoriented and agitated. His walking was increasingly uncoordinated and he began to lose his eyesight.

A repeat MRI scan of the boy's brain revealed abnormalities and a brain biopsy was taken at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children in London. It revealed neuronal death and evidence of central nervous system damage and chronic inflammation. Despite aggressive treatment, his seizures increased, he became weak on his left side, went blind and the five-year-old died seven weeks later.


Spinal fluid and urine samples collected during the boy's last hospitalisation, as well as RNA re-extracted from his brain biopsy, were sent to the Public Health England Virus Reference Laboratory for sequencing.

Researchers, led by Sofia Morfopoulou of the Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, and at the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, used deep sequencing technology to identify the MuV -JL5 vaccine virus strain in the boy's brain biopsy which was negative for all other viruses.

Genetic Drift and Outbreaks

Mutations in the mumps vaccine virus from that in the batch of the vaccine the boy had received were also detected. The study refers to a 2015 study confirming "genetic instability" of mumps vaccine virus that leads to "genetic drift" between different vaccine batches and may explain why some mumps vaccines induce more serious adverse reactions than others, especially when they are grown on different media.

This science may also explain why the mumps vaccine is failing. A recent outbreak among more than 1,600 mostly vaccinated people in Arkansas has public health officers there admitting that the vaccine isn't protecting against emerging new strains of the virus.

It’s part of a growing phenomenon that scientists are reporting in many vaccines called “sero-conversion” – when vaccines diminish the strain of a virus they are targeting, but another strain of the same virus blooms -- just as antibiotics wipe out bacterial infections but leave antibiotic-resistant superbugs to thrive. 

One study in chickens found that vaccination against one disease virus “enhances the fitness of more virulent strains”, making it possible for superbug strains to develop and be transmitted to other chickens, creating “conditions that promote the emergence of pathogen strains that cause more severe disease in unvaccinated hosts”.

A 2015 study of humans in the journal Microbiome, found that the nasal flu vaccine did the same thing. The researchers concluded that the vaccine activates the immune system in a way “may foster the disproportionate emergence of potentially pathogenic species such as S. aureus”-- a bug associated with ear infections and serious neuropsychiatric disorders like PANDAS.

Sero-replacement is a recognized snag for numerous vaccines. A 2017 study  tries to quantify the problem with a pneumococcal vaccine. It’s a documented difficulty with a rotavirus vaccine.  And it’s a long-documented problem with the polio vaccine. This 2016  study , for example, acknowledges that live attenuated oral poliomyelitis vaccine strains are “genetically unstable”, and their circulation (unavoidable when people defecate the vaccine virus which can hang around for decades), “can lead to the emergence of pathogenic circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses”. It turns out, the vaccine virus mutates and recombines with other circulating strains and produces something even more “neurovirulent”.

That is why the World Health Organisation is losing its battle with polio in India. More children are paralyzed and die there now than would ever be harmed by wild polio because they are afflicted with a new “acute flaccid paralysis” -- a polio they won’t call polio because it’s made in their laboratories. It’s also strikingly similar to the polio-like "mystery illness" paralysing children in America.


The British researchers in the current study compare this mumps encephalitis case to documented measles encephalitis and suggest a "common pathogenic process" is at work.  They cite a 2015 study in the journal Science and Translational Medicine that describes a 13-month-old baby who died from encephalitis after the MMR where vaccine virus was found in his brain and throughout his body. These results make a "strong case for deep sequencing of brain tissue where other methods have failed" to identify a pathogen, the study said.

In their conclusion, the researchers give heed to the "highly effective and safe vaccine" mantra required to keep publishing.  As usual, there is no hint of apology for physician-induced death. No consideration of how often this same pathology might play a role in SIDS or autism, of course, although public health has been scratching their heads about those for a very long time. But they do say "this case highlights the importance of developing strategies such as newborn screening to exclude the very small proportion of infants at extremely high risk of complications from live-attenuated vaccines."

That presumes there is a way to screen children at risk of live virus vaccines which include the MMR, the chickenpox and flu vaccines. There is no evidence that the little boy in the study was ill before he got his MMR.  Yet they have begun the quest for his deficiency or genetic weakness. And they may find some because we all have them. But they are ignoring the research they just cited, that there is problem inherent in the vaccine manufacturing process and with genetic drift of the viruses. It's more evidence that the old medical paradigm, which sees something wrong with the person who cannot tolerate the drug rather than with the drug itself, is getting older by the minute.

The answer from public health, of course, is always the same: time for another vaccine. Another dose, another strain, another booster for this group or that.  And an endless, circuitous virus chase. But in public health, the question if there might be a better way to fight disease in unthinkable. They would never seek to understand why most kids get through measles without a hitch and are left with lifelong protection against the disease and more protection too against diseases like cancer, or to find out what is lacking in the immune systems of the few children who don’t. But can we really continue this aim of vaccinating everyone against everything? What if it came down to something as simple as making sure kids got vitamins instead of vaccines? Too dangerous? At least vitamins couldn’t mutate and infect their brains.


Even if screening high-risk newborns from vaccines were possible, (and it’s a great idea), there's no chance of it happening in the current public health paradigm. Because for public health to start screening newborns for susceptibility to vaccine dangers, they would first have to admit what this science shows clearly, that vaccines have dangers. That they can and do cause serious brain damage and even death. And if they admit that, then they have to concede the possibility that vaccines may have a role in other neurodevelopmental disorders that are epidemic in children today.

How likely is that to happen at the Centers for Disease Control where people like Colleen Boyle and Frank DeStefano still oversee immunisation safety? People who, everyone knows, including their colleague who blew the whistle on them, knowingly manipulated, buried and shredded evidence to hide a link between the MMR and autism. People who would deceive the American public, and people across the globe, to protect their vaccines rather than the children who get them. And who would watch as millions of children suffer as a result, and do nothing?

What this science shows more than anything else, is how desperately we need President-elect Trump to move forward in 2017 with his commission on vaccine safety and scientific integrity.

MMR Vaccine Research Dashboard

For evidence-based research on the MMR vaccination, visit the Research Dashboard.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

Internal Site Commenting is limited to members.
Disqus commenting is available to everyone.

My concern about Kennedy is the worst case scenario wherein Trump will start a crusade to give big pHARMa billions of taxpayer dollars to "green" their vaccines and make them "safe". Below I'm including a post from one of my Facebook friends who I find to generally be very credible. See what you think     ~ Joan

Posted by Jason Strope on Facebook 1/13/17:
To everyone excited about Trump appointing Robert Kennedy to head his "Vaccine Safety Council" (be sure to note the name of that council and know that there literally can never be such a thing as a safe vaccine), I implore you to read this closely. Before reading his quote, you should know that Robert Kennedy admits to being pro-vaccine and that he just focuses on the dangers of the thimerosal (mercury) in vaccines. Here is a recent quote from Robert Kennedy on his belief that there should be state and federal policies to enforce vaccines. I have been telling people for years that mandatory vaccinations are not the main threat to vaccine opponents, but that the creation of "clean" or "green vaccines" has always been the thing to be aware of because, with their introduction, those who oppose vaccines will no longer have any proverbial legs to stand on in regards to not vaccinating in the eyes of the state/federal government.

During his testimony before the Vermont House Health Care Committee, Kennedy stated:

“I’m pro-vaccine. I’ve had all six of my kids vaccinated,” he added. “I think we ought to have state and federal policies that maximize vaccine coverage of the population. But I think we have to begin the process by making sure the vaccines are safe, efficacious and that the regulatory agency which recommends vaccines … and monitors them has integrity and credibility, and, unfortunately, that is not the case at the moment.”

(One source of many:

Here is another quote from a recent question and answer on

"I am for vaccines. I have been tracking mercury in fish for 30 years and nobody has called me antifish. I am pro-vaccine. I had all my kids vaccinated. I think vaccines save lives. But we are also seeing an explosion in neurodevelopmental disorders and we ought to be able to do a cost-benefit analysis and see what’s causing them. We ought to have robust, transparent science and an independent regulatory agency. Nobody is trying to get rid of vaccines here. I just want safe vaccines."


I know what I'm talking about, people. I don't talk out of my rear and I don't draw illogical conclusions in any way.

I hope and pray that everyone chooses to refrain from begging for or simply accepting these table scraps that are thrown our way. I understand the desire for change (especially with things like vaccines), but that will never be found in the state, the puppets of the state or especially the architects of the state.



On the bright side, exposing the vaccine atrocities will wake a percentage of the masses to stop blindly trusting their doctors.

What RFK Jr said before he had power and after 'could' be two quite different things. It would be nice to think that all politicians spoke their mind 100% but we know that will never be true. Even with the good (cough-cough) ones. Knowing now, how much money and lobbying big pharma does, I would not be at all surprised if his previous comments were toned-down. Just the fact that he is now asking the questions and calling them out, should make for interesting times.

The proof however - as always - will be in the pudding. If RFK Jr manages to remove even one vaccine and save one child, it will have been worth it. Good luck to him. Hope he doesn't go the same way as many others...


© 2018   Created by rose.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service