Recently released Bastille Day terrorist movie

Bastille Day - The Movie (2016)

Bastille Day, a 2016 movie released a few weeks ago that just happens to be about a "terrorist" attack in France on 14th July.

I mean c'mon....really!!

Views: 7708

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of The ConTrail to add comments!

Join The ConTrail

Comment by INGAORAMA on August 9, 2016 at 16:19

I think these bastards (illuminati z-clan) are using all what they can to send out big time subliminal messages-in movies-tv-series-drills..and of course the steam boiled fabricated mainstream media..But look at tv-series like Dark angel-Fringe-"V"-Jericho- "Dome"..just to name few...

Comment by Michael Barnes on July 24, 2016 at 0:50

Thank You

Comment by deanna munson on July 20, 2016 at 14:59
Comment by John de Rothschild on July 19, 2016 at 12:32

WRECKING BAR!!!!!!

NOW MORE THAN BULLET STICKERS, THEY USED A FLAT ENDED WRECKING BAR TO POKE "BULLET HOLES" IN THE METAL! ANOTHER BUST!

You can't get a clear picture of the bullet holes in the metal on the truck. I FOUND OUT WHY. It is because they were obviously poked into the metal with a wrecking bar!

ALL OF THESE "BULLET HOLES" IN THE METAL ON THE SIDE OF THE TRUCK ARE NOW PROVEN TO "SUPPOSED TO BE" STRAIGHT ON POINT BLANK SHOTS ACCORDING TO THE "SHOOT OUT" VIDEO. IN THAT VIDEO NOT A SINGLE ONE THAT HIT THE SIDE WAS FIRED FROM THE FRONT OF THE TRUCK. THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY ELONGATED BULLET HOLES ON THE SIDE OF THE TRUCK. YET, NOT ONLY ARE THEY ELONGATED, THEY ARE ALL RECTANGULAR WITH SQUARE CORNERS. SO EITHER THE POLICE SHOOT RECTANGULAR BULLETS NOW, OR A WRECKING BAR WAS USED, THAT IS THE ONLY WAY THIS HAPPENED, AND IT EXPLAINS PERFECTLY WHY YOU CAN'T FIND ANY CRYSTAL CLEAR BULLET PICTURES OF THE SIDE OF THIS TRUCK ANYWHERE. IT ALSO EXPLAINS WHY THERE ARE NO EXIT HOLES. Despite the censorship, someone managed to get a picture of the holes that was good enough even if it was not "crystal clear".

Obvious problems with the Nice terror attack:

1. None of the video shows the truck actually hit anyone.

2. They lied about the truck going through barricades and into a "people only" area. The truck only goes down a street with existing traffic, where if people are watching out like they should, they would not get hit. And it was not going fast at all, like it would be on a death mission. The death toll could not have been this high. If he was lucky, he would have hit only one or two people even if he went full speed through red light crosswalks which were never mentioned in the MSM.

3. There is no police shoot out video, despite what claims are. Police simply approach the side of the truck that has no "bullet holes" and go around it. There is no scene at all of them shooting the glass, or putting a single bullet hole in the truck. There is only sound, which could be dubbed in and no glass fragments flying, no holes appearing, NOTHING. All "holes" appear at angles the camera never gets live, despite the fact that the camera followed the police in! This would be done if you used bullet stickers, and had pre existing holes in the cab, on the OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE TRUCK already in place for the still cameras later that the video camera could not ever see because if they were there before the police arrived, it would prove it all fake. We are just supposed to believe this camera guy stayed in the line of fire as the police shot towards him, from the side of the cab you can't see, after they went around it ON THE SAME VIDEO.

When I first heard of this story, I made a few assumptions that were wrong. I assumed the truck swerved and hit people. That was wrong, despite the fact they said it. I assumed the truck went into an area that was blocked off for pedestrians only, down a path way that only people were supposed to be on. I BELIEVED THAT WAS THE STORY, BECAUSE THEY SAID SO. THAT WAS WRONG, IT WAS JUST ON A NORMAL STREET THAT WAS NOT BLOCKED OFF AT ALL.

The entire pretext for this story is so fake it could not possibly happen. It would not be possible to go down any street that is allowing normal traffic, and hit more than a couple people even if you tried. People are not stupid, they have brains and eyballs and ears, and are a moving target. The truck is loud. You can't sneak up on anyone at 40 mph and just bash them. It is not fast enough for surprise, or slow enough for the truck to be quiet. This truck did not go on a rampage through a deaf club. And the videos show that even if the truck was speeding, it was going close to the normal speed limit for the street on top of that! If the truck was not jumping the curbs and bashing barricades, the entire story is BULLSHIT.

I WAITED TO SAY THIS UNTIL IT COULD BE ABSOLUTELY PROVEN: NO BULLETS WERE EVER FIRED AT THE TRUCK.

Comment by Lee Jun-fan on July 18, 2016 at 12:48

The cellphone footage where it shows the truck accelerating before apparently mowing down the crowd has been doctored like the Zapruda film

Comment by George W. Reichel on July 17, 2016 at 4:33
.


Police secure the area around the truck in Nice on July 15.
NOT A DROP OF BLOOD ON WHITE MURDER TRUCK!
By Mike King


This white car (or was it one passing by?) struck and splattered 1 animal.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OSclXkE03ac/hqdefault.jpg


This white train struck and splattered 1 animal.
All aboard the murder train


This white truck struck and splattered 1 animal.
http://d13beo3f7vpmvd.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Cow.jpg

HOWEVER....


Nice, France: This squeaky-clean white truck, we are told, struck, splattered, crushed and killed 83 people and injured nearly 200 more -- many of them "critically."
http://www.trbimg.com/img-578868d4/turbine/la-fg-france-truck-crash-20160714-pictures/650/650x366 http://media2.s-nbcnews.com/j/msnbc/components/video/201607/x_lon_cabshot_160715.nbcnews-ux-1080-600.jpg Police secure the area around the truck in Nice on July 15.


http://thumb101.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/4024045/414469777/stock-photo-squirrel-dead-lay-on-road-by-car-accident-male-squirrel-s-tail-bunch-414469777.jpg http://www.trbimg.com/img-578868d4/turbine/la-fg-france-truck-crash-20160714-pictures/650/650x366

More blood on a dead roadside squirrel than on the white mass-murder truck! Heck -- I once struck a low flying pigeon and had a few blood drops on my front fender!


http://www.partycheap.com/v/vspfiles/photos/57129-2.jpghttp://www.dezignwithaz.com/images/bullet-hole-car-decal.jpg http://i.imgur.com/2icRwOM.jpg?2

What horrible "shooting!" Not a single sticker, er, bullet on the driver's side. And no hairline cracks?

 

Another "wag the dog" hoax attack designed to frame the big bad Muslims and keep everyone in a state of fear and subservient to the warmongering governments of NATO and Israel.
Comment by renate on July 16, 2016 at 20:32
LOL That’s why they’re looking for crisis actors, so they can make movies.or news....what a bunch of sick f****ks.  mad world, the only people they fool are the ones watching tv. You'd think the cops would get sick of these foolish games. Maybe not if they make alot of moneypussies.
Comment by John de Rothschild on July 16, 2016 at 20:24

PROVEN: NO BULLETS WERE EVER FIRED AT THE TRUCK.

INSTEAD, BULLET STICKERS WERE PUT ON THE TRUCK, AND I CAN PROVE IT. ALSO: If there really were dead bodies at the scene, they were thrown out the back of the truck, which was empty and inexplicably a refrigerated truck, "inexplicably", of course, unless you needed to keep bodies fresh.

TAKE A LOOK AT THIS AND EXPLAIN IT!

UPDATE: THE NEXT DAY THEY SMASHED THE WINDSHIELD, BECAUSE PEOPLE POINTED OUT THE LACK OF CRACKS. DO NOT BE FOOLED BY THIS, THE PHOTO ABOVE SHOWS HOW IT REALLY WAS, WITH PERFECT CLARITY.

July 15 2016

UPDATE: The truck driver rampage in France story has multiple gaping holes which I will briefly mention here: 1. No second party cell phone coverage despite 40,000 people present. Also nothing from people on balconies who were far enough away from the action to cover it with real cameras. 2. No first responders, relatives or anyone else with the dead bodies more than a half hour after the carnage started, with the truck sitting there with windows shot. NO FIRST RESPONDERS FOR OVER A HALF HOUR? NO POLICE MOB? EVEN LONG AFTER EVERYTHING WAS COMPLETELY SECURED? Just photo op bodies laying there. YEP. STAR WARS HAPPENED. It looked so real. I never saw an ambulance in Star Wars either.

In some of the much much later videos and photos they show ambulances, but if it was a truck attack happening over a mile, then even a quarter mile away, where the people were hit, there should have been mobs of ambulances while this was going on. Yet there was not even one. How would bystanders or ambulances even know it was a terror attack? They would not have stayed away, they would have responded like normal. First responders should have been at the beginning of the scene in minutes, not over an hour later, especially since this supposedly happened at a major event, where first responders are staged and ready to go, EVERYWHERE. So they got blankets to cover the bodies, but no paramedics? HOAX!

My original post follows. It is different from what other people said, so I am leaving it as is to provide perspective in addition to discoveries others have made.

Truck driver rampage story has a glaring hole

Here it is: Supposedly this guy went on a 40 MPH rampage for 30 minutes. But he only went 1 mile. Common core failure. COMMON CORE BREACH! 40 mph for 30 minutes equals 20 miles. To cover only one mile, he could have only been going two miles an hour.

So we have a glaring problem with this story already.

If this story actually happened, something else makes a lot more sense: The truck was taken over via remote control, the people remote controlling the truck caused a malfunction in a little less than a minute and a half, and the driver sat inside the disabled truck in shock for 28 minutes and 40 seconds until the police arrived and shot him. Gun thrown in to add spice, he probably did not have one or he would have shot bystanders. "Allahu Akbar" line added for spice (yes, he "shouted that" the moment before the final bullet hit him, even though he'd already been shot at for a while.) How would he know RIGHT WHEN THE RIGHT BULLET WAS COMING SO IT WAS TIME TO SAY THAT?

Lots 'O bullshit here already, if they want REAL NEWS to be believable, they can't spike it with this B.S. if it is real to begin with!

Ok, let's line item this:

1. He went 40 mph. 2. He went one mile.
3. It took him a half hour to do it.
4. He had a gun, and already "demonstrated" with the truck that he wanted to kill people. But he shot no one.
5. He conveniently shouted Allahu Akbar.

Yep, that all makes sense to me. How about a little more sense than that even?

REAL PROBABLE SCENARIO 1:

1. His truck was taken over via remote, as all vehicles sold in the U.S. are required to have after a little known law passed in 2005 mandating that some form of cell network linked control had to be in all new vehicles from 2005 onward. This probably became law in Europe also. 2. They sped it to 40 mph, went through the barricades and started mowing people down with it.
3. After a mile or so and in less than 2 minutes, they caused a malfunction in the truck and it stopped, probably by ripping an air line loose (which would lock up the brakes)
4. Mo sat there in shock, with the doors locked because they locked them via remote, for (according to the requirements of not-so-common-core math,) 28 minutes and 40 seconds (until police arrived). That is how you can explain why he did not get out and run during all that time, and why he shot no one despite "having a gun" which would have allowed him to get out and run.
5. Finally armed police arrived and shot him through the glass, and they made up an excuse that he had a gun.
6. "Allahu Akbar" was added to the story for spice.

Probable scenario 2:

It was a drill and they killed the patsy.

One way or another, real or not, they have spiced this story with enough B.S. to wreck it's credibility entirely. Who knows - maybe the guy did flip out and start mowing people down, but if the story is sewn with obvious patent bullshit, it's a fat chance I am going to believe any of it.

AS USUAL, PATSY DEAD. This time (obviously) because if they did remote control his truck, they could not have him in court saying that. The same tired story we have seen far too much: dead men tell no tales

© 2018   Created by rose.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service