After surreptitiously releasing to the public one week ago, the FBI unceremoniously announced today the unprecedented release of never-before-seen images from the attacks of September 11, 2001, and some of the pictures evoke still more questions.
Others could be seen as putting to rest a popular theory American Airlines Flight 77 never actually smashed into the Pentagon.
The FBI Vault release is minute in size, to say the least — with a mere 27 images comprising the file — and does not include video, audio, nor anything other than photos.
But, given the stony silence from the U.S. government toward families of victims of the attacks, even the meager disclosure is a welcome morsel of information with the potential to provide answers.
Indeed, in the very first image, labeled plainly, “9-11 Pentagon Debris 1,” a single piece of wreckage sits isolated on a parcel of lawn — bearing the American Airlines logo and marked with letters and numbers.
While this and pictures of evidence like it ostensively did come from the lawn of the Pentagon in the wake of the plane smashing into the building’s side, it would be prudent to note the lack of context — such as the burned and gaping hole — to distinguish it singularly.
Mangled metal in the second image appears obviously to have come from a plane, but — like the entire release — no description accompanies to explain when, where, or how the wreckage was discovered by investigators.
The third file again shows plane debris — this time, the horrendously twisted metal includes a painted red “C” with a white outline, as seen painted on the sides of American Airlines.
Several images of the emergency response to the crash follow, evincing a cavernous hole in the Pentagon building, as fire and rescue crews descend on the burning rubble.
Although the aforementioned collectively would seem to put to rest that no airplane ever crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11, multiple images of exterior and interior damage evince a smaller hole than would be intuitive — but the sagging floors, twisted girders, and general destruction do show how much of the building suffered on impact.
While all of these images appear to at least generally align with the official account of what happened with Flight 77 that day, three images cannot be explained — because they seem to defy logic.
Assumedly taken from an aircraft hovering overhead and from an angle behind the blasted hole, three images show the rounded chasm cleaved into the building’s outer ring — but the burned stone from fires resulting from the explosion doesn’t extend into the inner area on the inside of the Pentagon’s second concentric segment.
However, without any evidence the crash affected the second ring, and observing what would have been the path the downed craft took through the building upon impact, a section of burned building stretching from the ground all the way to the roof oddly and implausibly appears — on the inside of the Pentagon’s third and middle ring.
Indeed, it’s entirely unclear how this strange pattern of damage in conjunction with lack of it could have occurred at all.
This isn’t meant to denounce the official story nor those proffered by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth — nor anyone else who has thoroughly examined the evidence and has a plausible theory
It should be noted the FBI released a number of revealing images previously — nearly five years ago, in late 2012 — evincing wreckage of Flight 77 found inside the Pentagon.
But these pictures, and the oddity of the release’s size and quiet announcement, should provoke thought and discussion of the events of that day — particularly considering the attacks of 9/11 ushered in the insidious War on Terror and Surveillance State.
The EXCELLENT CItizens Enquiry on thepentaCON.com
provided overwhelming evidence that the flight of the Pentagon Plane
DID indeed occur, on time.... but not quite on track....
Where the evidence became thin on the ground was
at the moment of PRESUMED impact.... the exact instant that
The Military Magician succeeded in distracting most of his
audience, to the point where almost nobody actually saw
the Boeing lift sharply and dive through the billowing smokescreen.
The one thing we can very safely ASSUME is that
the actual airplane that skimmed over the Pentagon roof
was NOT flying route AA77 .... nor anywhere near Route AA77.
The official Government BTS website had Route AA11 cancelled
that very day.
AA77 was also canceled. Neither route left the tarmac
(Gerald Holmgren 2004)
Made me even more suspicious about AA175 when the video
evidence in one shot was measured at 589 MPH and
the very-same airplane from another angle was flying at
less than half that (impossible-to-fly) velocity.
What annoyed me most was that it was a whole 3 years
before I was forced into the no-planes position....
Michael, I wonder about the other plane, that didn't make it. Could it be that it was intended to hit building NUMBER 7. Given that it was, and number 7 just free fell without an impact....
Which other plane, Sarah?
AA77 never hit the Pentagon, as it never left the tarmac due to being cancelled... it couldn't have gone anywhere else....
AA11 also canned, also never left the tarmac
(Google Gerald Holmgren 9/11 planes for proof, including account of how long it took the BTS webmistress to attempt vainly to correct her idiopathetic errors)
We're told AA11 was what brought down WTC1 ....which, along with many other clues leads me to dogmatically declare that NO PLANE ever hit (either) Twin Tower...
The Boeing on Route UA175 cannot POSSIBLY have been the "thing" that was dashing across the screen towards WTC2 at an easily-measurable 589MP.... because ANY jetliner will completely disintegrate at anything over VNe of 360pm AT 700 feet altitude..... even if the engines could develop 10 times the power needed for another 150 knots :-)
As for the fourth plane on Route UA93, the BTS website records the takeoff.... but absolute zero record of it ever landing.... and NO reports of any crash.
My not-very-inspired guess for what it is worth (and I fondly think it's worth bang-on-target) is that as we can prove no airplane hit either WTC1 or WTC2.... I'd bet UA93 was never destined to fly anywhere near Building 7.
When you check the Shanksville "crash" site and you discover the site, with the bonfire and the 40 dancing orange-suited crisis actors, was a very-obvious crater in a 1995 photograph available to view on the USGS website....UA93 remains as much a complete fake as the other 3.
Feed these thoughts into all the other 9/11 data and we are left with only one serious question.... as asked by Dr Judy Wood
"Where DID The Towers Go?"
All the questions we keep asking pale into total insignificance when we realize 3 million-ton skyscrapers TURNED TO DUST ..... not just collapsed or got demolished.... literally dustified.
Plane did not crash into the Pentagon. Raytheon A-3 Sky Warrior painted in airliner colors and logo. Droned. Handily the Pentagon had just undergone Renovation - great time to plant explosives.
Yes - I just posted it to show you the propaganda being driven.
amazing ,the identifying part of the plane ,kind of like finding plastic passports in a pile of molten steel
Earth You may wonder why I have Earth here again, and that’s because here it represents one of the four classical elements. Represented in alchemy as an inverted triangle with a line through it, Earth represents all things solid.
Bullshit.Reminds me of their handling of the Roswell Incident.With each new proclamation,their story becomes more and more incredible.Funny that they won't release any of the numerous surveillance videos.https://youtu.be/7BNqgNvUhRQ
Absolutely spot-on comment George.
This is Roswell all over again. And that first image especially, means nothing. A stage prop with no context on a generic bit of grass.
I've seen more convincing fakes on Thirdphaseofthemoon's YT channel than this!