As most people who read my emails know, I have a certain contempt for most central bankers, lawyers, the medical profession and pharmaceutical companies. This does not mean I despise every person in these categories, every operation or every drug. Because there are rare exceptions of good people in these organization whose motivation is first to help people rather than accumulate more and more money or material possessions for themselves. But it does mean, overall, I still consider the vast majority of these people in these professional organizations are largely highly educated and over-paid common charlatans. Because of this, often people who sympathize with my views, contact me at times with more and more amazing information about them. Well, one such case was yesterday, when I received a surprise telephone call from a nurse (who shall remain anonymous to protect her identity) who works at Waikato Hospital, in Hamilton, New Zealand. Her call was to tell me all about Waikato Hospital Board’s new draconian vaccination policies for healthcare workers and for doctors and nurses who refuse to be vaccinated. What she told me literally made my hair stand on end, so I thought I would like to share it with others as it sooner or later is going to affect everyone in New Zealand, and indeed, the rest of the world.

On July 1 (or thereabouts) in 2017, the Waikato Hospital Board introduced its winter influenza seasonal program for immunisation of all of its healthcare workers. You can read the full details by doing a “Google –search” of it using this phrase: “[PDF] VACCINATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE WORKERS POLICY – WAIKATO DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD.” Their stated goal is to enforce this policy from May 2015 to May 2018, although it is usually applied most vigorously from the end of June until the end of October each year.

The Waikato District Health Board (DHB) is one of 20 district health boards in New Zealand. It serves a population of more than 390,000. It runs a large number of hospitals, pharmacies, General Practitioner practices, 57 aged residential care facilities, and as at 30 June 2016, it had a staff of 6,633. The DHB is governed by a board of up to 11 members who are publicly elected every three years. While it gives the impression of “democracy” to the public, it is a far from that because the NZ Government Minister of Health appoints four members to each board, plus the board’s chair and deputy chair, thus giving the Government the majority of votes in all the major decisions the board makes.

If you look at the Waikato District Health Board and the New Zealand Ministry of Health’s websites, (identical to all other countries as well), you will find that all their key health care policies, including the policies on vaccinations, are coming straight from directives of the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO). Here, for example, are WHO’s recommendations for the influenza virus vaccines for use in the 2017 southern hemisphere season:

It is important to understand that the United Nations World Health Organization (WHO) is directly controlled by three powerful criminal big business international groups, the World Medical Association, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers (IFPMA) and the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP). In turn, these three criminal organizations are funded by and are controlled by Anglo/American bankers epi-centred in the City of London, and directed by the handful of individuals who own them. Hence, the whole primary objective of this “global healthcare system cartel” is focussed on making money, and is certainly not even remotely concerned with the genuine healthcare of anyone. This includes the hundreds of billions of dollars generated from the sale of animal and human vaccines each year as well.

Starting from July 2015, the Waikato District Health Board was the first DHB in New Zealand to introduce a new WHO “hard-line” policy forcing unvaccinated staff, doctors and nurses to get flu jabs. For those who do not comply, the program’s goal is to intimidate and bully the resisters by forcing them to permanently wear surgical masks continuosly for about 4 months from the end of June through to the end of October while working with patients. In Waikato Hospital in Hamilton, prior to the new vaccination policy for staff being introduced, there were exactly 53 per cent of all doctors and nurses that were vaccinated. In other words, nearly half of all doctors and nurses (47%) were UNVACCINATED. (This is typical of the medical profession around the world that has a high proportion of their membership who understand vaccines are extremely damaging and don’t vaccinate themselves or their own families, yet at the same time, they lie to their patients recommending vaccines are safe which they very well know are not).Yet after the new policy was implemented fully in 2015, by 2016 more than 75 per cent were vaccinated. One worker was fired over the hospital’s hard-line vaccination policy: Incredibly, these bullying and intimidation tactics forcing all unvaccinated healthcare staff to wear surgical masks has happened at a time when nearly 50% of all doctors and nurses are strongly opposed to having themselves vaccinated, but through fear of losing their jobs they have in large numbers stepped into line and surrendered to this intrusive coercion.

Worldwide, although unfortunately still in a distinct minority, there are huge numbers of doctors, nurses, pharmacologists and other health professionals who are strongly opposed to vaccinations: Here is an outstanding website of some of their testimonies posted on: Midwives and Health Professionals Against Vaccination:

On 29 March 2017, the Waikato DHB News reported that Waikato Health Board Chief Executive Dr Nigel Murray announced that the DHB increased the staff vaccination compliance rate again, with 83 per cent of all staff getting the influenza vaccine in 2016. This means that in just two years of this outrageous bullying and intimidation, staff vaccination rates have increased by about 30% from 53% to 83%.

Now this is what this young nurse told me over the phone yesterday about what has started to happen this week in her ward at Waikato DHB’s Hospital in Hamilton. All the vaccinated doctors and nurses are now walking around her ward carrying out their duties as per normal. But as the now approximately 20 per cent of doctors and nurses who are still unvaccinated are required to wear surgical masks, many of the patients and visitors are asking them some penetrating new questions: “Why are you nurses and doctors wearing surgical masks and all the others are not?” Answer” “We are being forced to wear the surgical masks by management supposedly because we are infectious because we are opposed to vaccinations and therefore unvaccinated. This is because we believe vaccines and the poisonous ingredients in them cause serious harm to people’s bodies, and as such, we choose to be unvaccinated.” Then follows another question from the patients and visitors: “Wow, going by the media, I thought all you guys were unanimous on the stated good health benefits of vaccinations, but obviously you are not. Maybe we need to look into the controversy ourselves too. If all the others not wearing masks including patients are vaccinated and immunized against the flu, can you please tell us how the few of you who are unvaccinated can infect them with the flu if you have it?” Answer: Yes, its insane isn’t it?

Currently there is an Asian doctor on her ward who is well-known to be passionately against vaccination, but who is resisting wearing his mask as required by the Hospital management who are overlooking it because he is a specialist. Now one of the unvaccinated nurses who is being forced to wear her mask is considering reporting him to the management to force him to wear his mask on grounds of severe discrimination against her under the Human Rights Act!

But of course you will never hear about this in the mainstream media because this whole tyrannical policy is controlled by the same gang of banking pirates who control the WMA, IFPMA, FIP and WHO right down to these mindless puppets in the local regional health board. Right now, this gross intimidation of nurses and doctors by these medical gangsters and common pirates is happening all around the world, not just in New Zealand.

On top of this abomination, the Waikato District Health Board in New Zealand plans to ask all visitors to their hospitals in the near future, to [supposedly] help protect sick and vulnerable patients this flu season, if they’ve had the influenza vaccine – and if they haven’t, they’ll all be asked to wear a surgical mask too, and if they don’t, they will not be allowed in the hospital at all.

Here is a Nursing Review article dated October 2015 Vol.15 (5) highlighting New Zealand nurses’ views about vaccines and surgical masks affecting them now: Here is another showing how many healthcare workers themselves are questioning why healthcare workers should all be vaccinated against the flu each year, or if they refuse, are being forced to wear surgical masks over the winter:

One can summarize this gross medical insanity being carried out by these professional imbeciles simply by describing why the flu vaccinations are so damaging to human health, and why these surgical masks being given to all doctors and nurses throughout the world do not even work?

Do surgical masks stop viruses?

There are dozens of different studies carried out in relation to the efficacy of surgical masks by major health agencies including the World Health Organization (WHO), the Center for Disease Control (CDC), pharmaceutical companies and mask manufacturers themselves, which all largely contradict each other. WHO and the CDC are now totally corrupt and controlled by big pharmaceutical multinationals, and the last thing one would want to believe is anything promoted by these agencies at all. There is still NO CONSENSUS among scientists or medical professionals as to how effectively surgical masks stop the transfer of viruses at all. Many experts actually say surgical masks are absolutely useless in stopping airborne transmission of viruses. Even if expensive hi-tech N95 surgical masks are used, and in most cases they generally are not, they will largely be useless in filtering out Human coronaviruses. The reason for this is that these hi-tech masks are claimed to filter out particles down to .3 microns at 95 per cent of the time (which in itself is debatable), yet these coronaviruses measure only between .1 and .2 microns, which is one to two times smaller and below the filtering cut-off of the masks. When challenged by these facts, the WHO or CDC “experts” promoting surgical masks will often claim that this doesn’t matter as most of these and other viruses often travel on top of larger carrier molecules or globs of mucus, so even a T-shirt or handkerchief wrapped around the mouth or nose will protect an infected person. Now if you believe this sort of errant poppycock you will believe anything! The real truth is that in all likelihood the cheaper surgical masks being dispensed to most people are virtually useless. Here are just two postings on the Internet of many that challenge the medical establishment’s false claims that there is consensus among experts that surgical masks filter out dangerous viruses and protect others from an infectious person: The whole process of having unvaccinated otherwise healthy staff wearing surgical masks like this is nothing short of insanity.

Influenza Vaccine Composition for New Zealand in 2017

Here is the official Government advice for the recommended influenza vaccine composition for New Zealand in 2017, published by Medsafe (New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority) revised 28 October 2016, developed from the Australian Influenza Vaccine Committee with a New Zealand representative, at a meeting held on 13 October 2016, under the control of the WHO Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System: Here is more info about this 2017 flu vaccine by Medpro WorkVax (NZ), actually confirming it is based on recommendations made by the World Health Organization:

So what are the ingredients in this year’s flu vaccine? According to this website article here: they are:

Flu Strain A/(California) (H1N1)
Flu Strain A/(Hong Kong) (H3N2)
Flu Strain B/(Brisbane)
Flu Strain B/(Phuket)
Formaldehyde (a poisonous compound used to deactivate the virus to prevent toxins from it causing illness in recipients)
Aluminium Salts (This is highly toxic, and has been used as an adjuvant in vaccines for over 80 years)
Gelatin (Is the pig-derived stabilizer to keep the vaccine consistency uniform between manufacture and use)
Thimerosal (Is the ethylmercury (mercury ) preservative in the vaccine which stops bacteria and fungi growing in it.Mercury is highly toxic)
Chicken Egg Proteins (From fertilized chicken eggs which helps the vaccine to grow, some remains in the vaccine)
Antibiotics (these are added to the sterile chicken eggs to stop bacteria growing. The most common antibiotic used is Neomycin)

The flu vaccines today are among the few vaccines left that manufacturers still use Thimerosal (mercury) in (patented by Eli Lilly in 1928). The removal of Thimerosal by the way is the result of criticism over the years from anti-vaccine organizations who claim it is one of the main ingredients in vaccines that cause autism and other serious health problems. Unfortunately, the alternatives being used in other vaccines today to replace Thimerosal are even worse. The replacements are primarily phenol and 2-phenoxyethanol. Now the same pharmaceutical companies that once said Thimerosal (mercury) was entirely safe, are now saying the same thing about phenol and phenoxyethanol, which of course is a blatant lie.

Phenol injections, significantly, were used by Hitler and the Nazis in their mass-murder and involuntary euthanasia program called Aktion T4 in which German physicians from September 1939 to August 1941 cold-bloodedly brutally killed 70,273 adults and children with mental and physical disabilities deemed unworthy to live. Phenol is a deadly poison and even in small doses is cumulative and toxic in the body.

Phenoxyethanol is also highly toxic to humans. It is a synthetic preservative produced using a complex process where phenol is treated with ethylene oxide (sometimes called phenol or carbolic acid). The Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) on phenoxyethanol states that it can cause skin and lung irritation, is toxic to the kidneys, nervous system, liver, and repeated long-term exposure can cause organ damage. These toxic effects can occur through inhalation, skin exposure and ingestion. For many years it has been used in cosmetic products generally at 2% or below, which manufacturers have claimed is non-toxic and safe. However, the European Commission on Cosmetic Ingredients stipulates that phenoxyethanol is toxic when applied to the lips or around the mouth. The FDA in the United States placed a warning to nursing mothers about using a brand of nipple cream that contained phenoxyethanol, stating that it could cause vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration and central nervous system problems in infants. So why are vaccine manufacturers using this poison as a primary preservative in many of their vaccines now when such damning historical and clinical evidence is already widely available pointing to it being highly toxic and unsuitable even for beauty products or babies?

Doctors and nurses against mandatory vaccination must take a stand over this issue or we all will be doomed

On 28-29 June 2017, a joint meeting between WHO and the Robert Koch Institute, US Center for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention and Agence de Medecine Preventive – Health Policy and Institutional Development Center (AMP-HPID) was held in Berlin, Germany, to establish the Global National Immunization Technical Advisory Group Network (GNN) whose main goal under the UN World Health Organization is to reach 100% vaccination rates for everybody. This will require mandatory vaccination worldwide for everyone.

At the beginning of the Waikato District Health Board’s program to intimidate and bully its staff into submission to be vaccinated, there were 47% of all doctors and nurses who were unvaccinated through their informed choice exercised because they were plainly opposed to this controversial medical procedure. Yet in just two years, after the District Health Board has implemented this outrageous policy of intimidation, more than 30% of these anti-vaccine healthcare professionals have now capitulated and given in to the system. It was bad enough before, that many of these individuals themselves were largely openly lying to their patients encouraging others to be vaccinated, while they themselves and their families were not. But now these individuals have gone a step further toward this neo-Nazi, fascist, global state of medical tyranny, and even had themselves, against their own consciences, deliberately vaccinated with substances the majority of them all know perfectly well are poisonous and incredibly evil.

What makes their actions so incredibly disgusting, is that at the Doctors’ Trial at Nuremberg after WW2, in which Nazi physicians were tried for their heinous crimes against humanity. An international code for all medical professionals and physicians was drawn up called the Nuremberg Code which has since been incorporated into the Geneva Convention for all medical doctors which requires all medical authorities and governments to provide for the VOLUNTARY CONSENT of all patients for all medical experiments and procedures including VACCINATIONS.

These basic civil rights were also later written into the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which was drafted in 1954 and signed by virtually all nations (including New Zealand) on 16 December 1966, and later were written into the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Part II of the Act covers a broad range of Civil and Political Rights. As part of the right to life and the security of the person, the Act guarantees everyone:

The right not to be deprived of life except in accordance with fundamental justice (Section 8)
The right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, degrading, or disproportionately severe treatment or punishment (Section 9)
The right not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation without consent (Section 10)
The right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment (Section 11)

Furthermore, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 guarantees everyone: Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion. This includes the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and belief, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO ADOPT AND HOLD OPINIONS WITHOUT INTERFERENCE (Section 1)

This is THE LAW in New Zealand. These human rights laws are very clear and concise and are written without any ambiguity whatsoever. So how come these District Health Board executives and the NZ Ministry of Health’s medical charlatans are blatantly abusing their powers by contravening these basic civil rights requirements? After all that we’ve learned from history about Hitler’s Third Reich of death, suffering and terror, replete with his Nazi thugs and these murderous, unethical German physicians – which ended up with the execution of some of them following the Doctors’ Trial – and now we are facing the same thing happening once again, but this time on a global scale.

We all may fervently ask ourselves this very important question; Why are these New Zealand doctors and nurses employed by the Waikato District Health Board in New Zealand (and indeed all the doctors and nurses from all around the world) so rapidly capitulating and following these unethical, dictatorial healthcare executives, who are now, for all intents and purposes, effectively becoming modern “neo-Nazi doctors” by contravening the basis tenets of the Nuremberg Code, the Geneva Convention, the United Nations Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 – by putting up with this enormous tyranny – when many of them know better – yet don’t have the guts to stand up and be counted over a practice which is not new.

One doesn’t have to be a genius to appreciate if this process is not urgently stopped, soon the right of voluntary, informed consent is likely to be abolished altogether – to facilitate all vaccinations becoming mandatory throughout the world. Should this unfortunately happen thereby reproducing the early stages of the old Nazi euthanasia program, could one be forgiven in thinking that if history repeats itself, there therefore may be a much higher goal in mind in having everyone throughout the world vaccinated through the policies of WHO. At the end of WW2 the Nazis were experimenting with vaccines to euthanize millions of unwanted individuals. So could those who run the UN now be assiduously working towards the same subtle goal, looking forward to a whole new era of racial hygiene, but this time on a global scale – euthanasia of all useless eaters through carefully targeted vaccine programs? Once full or near full vaccination levels are met globally, such a euthanasia program on a global basis would be very easy to implement. Even now, the majority of doctors wouldn’t have a clue what viruses are in the vaccine vials they give. In New Zealand now rabbits when they become a nuisance are kept under control by infecting them with viruses. So why not humans?

If one may conclude with a simple word of praise for the minority of doctors and nurses who do have the great courage to speak up and make an honest stand, usually with an advanced academic knowledge on the subject more than most. Let us all, who are members of the general public, reflect upon these precious, courageous healthcare individuals who do have the courage to speak up against the rising torrent of mainstream medical pro-vaccination opinion against them. Many of these anti-vaccine or pro-choice professionals have spent years at university tirelessly studying their trade to become fully qualified in their chosen field, yet sadly risk losing their entire livelihood, high income and prestigious vocation. Doctors who also speak up against vaccination, risk being severely disciplined by their local medical council as well, having their licence cancelled and their name struck off the medical register. So one does have some degree of sympathy for the dire predicament they are now finding themselves in. But in the end, we all have to draw our own line in the sand for what is right or wrong don’t we?

Even if you still believe that vaccinations are good contrary to the opinions of this author, one can accept that. But one would ask, can you honestly, in all good conscience, also support this growing dictatorial regime that is accelerating among us by the day associated with it, working towards full mandatory vaccination, even abolishing the most basic of civic rights, that of individual, voluntary, informed consent, free of any dictatorial government coercion, oppression or intimidation? Many say Hitler and his brutal thugs didn’t come to power because they were popular. Rather, they came to power because most people were entirely indifferent, apathetic. Those Germans who knew the Nazis were evil, largely didn’t speak up when they were able. Before long it was too late. They had sealed their own fate by their own ineptitude. Tens of millions died in the aftermath. One knows its hard to accept for the average person, but are we all are living in a similar period – now!



Chickenpox: A new, dreaded disease?  Hilary Butler


Italy & Germany Begin Mandatory Vaccinations

Watch Vaccines Revealed here for free


What Causes Autism? This Explanation Might Be the Best We've Heard!


Dr. Rachael Ross, MD: “I Am Scared Of The Vaccines”


"The Doctors" Star Rachael Ross MD says she feels like an ASS misunderstanding vaccines


UFC fighter speaks out against vaccines following his son's tragic death


Vaccines Forever: Non-specific effects you should know — Part 2


One less girl: 12 yo dies hours after receiving Gardasil shot


Hear The Silence (2003) Dr Andrew Wakefield Drama


(2004) Dr. Tenpenny: Vaccines: The Risks, The Benefits, The Choices


Jabbing back at snooty vaccine extremist, Paul Offit


Social Engineering of Medical Professionals


Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations: Should Their Views be Silenced?

Views: 91

© 2018   Created by rose.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service